Institutional research agreements
Bring your departments, available data, and publication priorities into one coordinated program. Sanad offers research and scientific writing support to hospitals, associations, universities, and other organizations.
Paid programs are scoped around your material, priorities, and available expertise. Original research requires data that have already been collected and are available for authorized use.
Choose the workstreams and article count after feasibility review.
Start with a defined project or coordinate a wider portfolio. The agreement sets the framework; each workstream has its own deliverables and responsibilities.
Multi-project program
One institutional agreement with a scope for each article or workstream. Agree on priorities, department leads, data readiness, review milestones, and reporting.
Best suited to a defined group of research and writing projects.
Focused project
Scope an original article, evidence review, case report, analysis, or manuscript revision. Use the first engagement to establish a practical working relationship.
Best suited to a clear immediate need or an initial paid pilot.
Ongoing agreement
Agree on a defined period, work allocation, review cadence, and service limits. Add assignments through approved scopes as your priorities develop.
Best suited to organizations with a continuing research or writing workload.
A program sized to your priorities
We can scope a multi-project program around that target. Begin with an inventory of available datasets, proposed review topics, and fully documented cases. Together, select the scientifically justified articles and agree on a staged delivery plan.
Ten is an illustrative planning target, not a completed portfolio or a promise of ten journal acceptances. The final article count follows feasibility review.
Each article needs a distinct scientific purpose. Overlapping work is reviewed together rather than divided simply to reach a paper count.
Combine selected services under one proposal, with the right reviewers and a defined scope for each assignment.
Research question refinement, methodology review, analysis planning, statistical analysis, interpretation, and manuscript development from collected, usable datasets.
Our team can develop narrative, scoping, or systematic reviews on agreed topics of interest. Meta-analysis is included when the question and available evidence justify pooling.
Prepare a clear scientific account from complete clinical documentation, relevant diagnostic material, and appropriate permissions. Case series follow the reporting and approval requirements of their design.
Standalone study-design advice, data-readiness assessment, statistical review, analysis plans, reproducible analyses, tables, and figures as agreed.
Manuscript development, language and structural editing, reference checks, journal fit assessment, formatting, cover letters, and submission preparation.
A point-by-point revision plan, response editing, manuscript alignment, and separately scoped additional analyses or literature work when required.
Conference abstracts, posters, plain-language summaries, referenced educational slides, and other agreed medical-writing outputs with institutional scientific review.
Publication planning, methodological consultations, protocol and ethics-document support, and research capacity-building sessions within an agreed scope.
Case reports
Case reports can form part of a paid institutional program. We assess the documentation and educational value before agreeing on manuscript support.
Use CARE and the selected journal's current instructions. Relevant image types depend on the case; clinical, radiology, and pathology images are not all mandatory in every report.
Relevant history, examination, clinical timeline, diagnostic workup and reasoning, treatment, and follow-up.
Available clinical photographs, radiology, pathology, and other diagnostic material where relevant, with suitable quality and permissions.
Include the patient perspective where feasible and confirm informed consent for publication, including identifiable images.
The responsible clinicians verify the account and address documentation gaps before submission.
Agree on the framework before the program begins. Actual authorship follows contribution and the applicable authorship criteria.
Objectives, article types, departments, and proposed outputs.
Available inputs, methods, deliverables, authors, and review responsibilities.
Milestones, dependencies, revision allowance, and points of contact.
Fees, currency, payment milestones, journal charges, confidentiality, and approved data access.
Start with your organization, departments, available material, planned outputs, and preferred timing. A nonconfidential outline is enough for the first conversation.
Please do not send patient records, identifiable images, or datasets through the public inquiry form.
